Anyway, I learned a few very important digital lessons on this trip, and even had a few lessons I already did know reinforced.
Probably the biggest, painful lesson I learned is that the digital screen on the back of my EOS 5D is quite unreliable in letting me know how an image is exposed. I'll explain. I have the brightness on the screen jacked up so I can see it better. It seemed like a reasonable thing to do, until I got home and looked at the images on our large LCD screen. Oops. Many (but not all) of my images were underexposed. Not a big deal - in most cases I could correct the problem in Photoshop and still get a decent image. I started leaning on my screen more and forgetting a basic rule of photography - trust your meter (in most cases, anyway). Bottom line - the meter is much more reliable than the screen on the back of your DSLR. The screen has its place (composition, are anyone's eyes closed?, etc.), but determining if you have the correct exposure (unless its WAY off) is not one of them, especially if you have the screen's brightness jacked all the way up.
It's now officially time for me to begin using the screen shade I bought a dog's year ago but I'm yet to use.
Anyway, enough talk - on to some images.

The above pic is less than stellar. (Insert sarcasm here) I later found out from a tour guide at the Space Needle that Mt. Rainier (know locally simply as "the mountain") is only visible from the Needle about 1/3 of the year; it's often obscured by clouds and fog.
Obviously, on this day, the mountain was visible, but a haze enveloped it. I'm thinking that a ND filter might have done the trick, but I don't have one for either one of my lenses. I don't currently have many filters for my lenses, since I recently changed my line-up to Canon L lenses, I couldn't keep my old filters because of filter size differences. Oh well, I'll get around to that eventually.
Anyway, this pic was a challenge to color-correct in Photoshop, too. I'm still not thrilled with the pic, but as our tour guide said, the mountain can be a challenge to photograph under what passes for the best of conditions. I'll take another run at this mountain next year when we go back.
Canon EOS 5D, Canon 24-70 2.8L lens, ISO 100, circular polarizing filter, exposure unrecorded.

Anyway, I do like this shot - the sky is near perfect in the image on a cloud-free day.
Canon EOS 5D, Canon 70-200 IS 2.8L lens, ISO 100, exposure unrecorded, circular polarizing filter.

Canon EOS 5D, Canon 24-70 2.8L lens, ISO 100, circular polarizing filter, exposure unrecorded.

Canon EOS 5D, Canon 70-200 IS 2.8L lens, ISO 100, exposure unrecorded

I'm very impressed by the lack of vignetting by Canon's 24-70 f2.8L lens, especially at the minimum focal length. It's the workhorse in my bag that I used for probably 75 percent of my shots, since I take a great deal of landscapes and architecture.
Canon EOS 5D, Canon 24-70 2.8L lens, ISO 100, circular polarizing filter, exposure unrecorded.
Stay tuned - many more photos coming later today / this evening.
No comments:
Post a Comment